Bugzilla

(In reply to Alessandro Castellani [:aleca] from comment #9)
> ```
> ab-card-listrow .ab-card-second-line {
>   line-height: 1.2em !important;
> }
> ```
> Thomas, can you confirm doing so fixes the issue on Windows and doesn't create any weird outcomes?

You also need to fix the name row which has same problem. 1.2 is not enough for me. 1.3 (without em) fixes this for me for the default size.
Font scaling still breaks the layout because of the fixed 36px height and fixed row positioning - current hard-coded implementation is so weird!

```
ab-card-listrow :is(.ab-card-first-line, .ab-card-second-line) {
	line-height: 1.3;
}
```

(In reply to Alessandro Castellani [:aleca] from comment #9)
> ```
> ab-card-listrow .ab-card-second-line {
>   line-height: 1.2em !important;
> }
> ```
> Thomas, can you confirm doing so fixes the issue on Windows and doesn't create any weird outcomes?

You also need to fix the name row which has same problem. 1.2 is not enough for me. 1.3 (without em) fixes this for me for the default size.
Font scaling still breaks the layout because of the fixed 36px height and fixed row positioning - current hard-coded implementation is so weird!

```
ab-card-listrow :is(.ab-card-first-line, .ab-card-second-line) {
  line-height: 1.3;
}
```

(In reply to Alessandro Castellani [:aleca] from comment #9)
> ```
> ab-card-listrow .ab-card-second-line {
>   line-height: 1.2em !important;
> }
> ```
> Thomas, can you confirm doing so fixes the issue on Windows and doesn't create any weird outcomes?

Tested on 102.1.0 (64-bit).

You also need to fix the name row which has same problem. 1.2 is not enough for me. 1.3 (without em) fixes this for me for the default size.
Font scaling still breaks the layout because of the fixed 36px height and fixed row positioning - current hard-coded implementation is so weird!

```
ab-card-listrow :is(.ab-card-first-line, .ab-card-second-line) {
  line-height: 1.3;
}
```