(In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk) from comment #38) > Is there a specific reason you marked version 102 as not affected? > > Version 102 has a similar problem, according to bug 1798874, [Mac with Thunderbird 102.3.1](https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1391627?utm_campaign=questions-reply&utm_source=notification&utm_medium=email#answer-1549962) and others. > Note - bug 1642138 has regressions reported against it. Wayne, not sure if Q aimed at me - I am only reporting ion the beta releases. No idea if the 102 pub release works, though if it is the same as was released afgter the 102.0.beta versions then it still fails, as its a result of a change in 102.0b7 b6 was fine
Bug 1786988 Comment 42 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Wayne Mery (:wsmwk) from comment #38) > Is there a specific reason you marked version 102 as not affected? > > Version 102 has a similar problem, according to bug 1798874, [Mac with Thunderbird 102.3.1](https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1391627?utm_campaign=questions-reply&utm_source=notification&utm_medium=email#answer-1549962) and others. > Note - bug 1642138 has regressions reported against it. Wayne, not sure if Q aimed at me - I am only reporting on the beta releases. No idea if the 102 pub release works, though if it is the same as was released after the 102.0.beta versions then it still fails, as the bug is a result of a change in 102.0b7 b6 was fine