I guess something is calling QueueCacheUpdate with a null acc? I wouldn't have thought a table part not having a table ancestor was something that happened in the wild, only in my twisted imagination (the aria-owns test case), but I guess it does somehow/somewhere?
Bug 1788597 Comment 1 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
I guess one of the table instances is calling QueueCacheUpdate with a null acc? I wouldn't have thought a table part not having a table ancestor was something that happened in the wild, only in my twisted imagination (the aria-owns test case), but I guess it does somehow/somewhere?