(In reply to Sarah Clements [:sclements] from comment #37) > I'm going to close this bug [...] > I've captured this original request in bug 1805254, and I'll reopen the privacy bug for posterity. Thanks! Minor bit of tidying, hopefully not stepping on toes: given that we've got bug 1805254 open to capture the same request as in this bug here, a "wontfix" resolution here doesn't make sense. (WONTFIX implies we-would-not-land-a-fix-to-address-the-issue-that-was-described.) It seems like we're using bug 1805254 as a clean slate to cover the same thing originally requested here, so let's change the resolution here from "wontfix" to "dupe of bug 1805254", to express that the original request is still under consideration, over on bug 1805254.
Bug 1793807 Comment 38 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Sarah Clements [:sclements] from comment #37) > I'm going to close this bug [...] > I've captured this original request in bug 1805254, and I'll reopen the privacy bug for posterity. Thanks! Minor bit of tidying, hopefully not stepping on toes: given that we've got bug 1805254 open to capture the same request as in this bug here, a "wontfix" resolution here doesn't make sense. (WONTFIX implies we-would-not-land-a-fix-to-address-the-issue-that-was-described.) It seems like we're using bug 1805254 as a clean slate to cover the same thing originally requested here, so let's change the closed-bug-resolution here from "wontfix" to "dupe of bug 1805254", to express that the original request is still under consideration, over on bug 1805254.