Bug 1795709 Comment 4 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Original comment by
on 
[Triage Comment]
Approved for beta as this should go on c-esr102 in 102.5.0.

[Approval Request Comment]
Regression caused by (bug #): N/A
User impact if declined: its an internal library used by librnp. little impact to zero
Testing completed (on c-c, etc.): Daily
Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): The zlib change itself will have little to no risk. The mach vendor piece may not work so well on c-esr102, but that's for for users anyway and should only run on c-central.
Revision 1 by
on 
[Triage Comment]
Approved for beta as this should go on c-esr102 in 102.5.0. Note to uplifter: 2 patches to uplift

[Approval Request Comment]
Regression caused by (bug #): N/A
User impact if declined: its an internal library used by librnp. little impact to zero
Testing completed (on c-c, etc.): Daily
Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): The zlib change itself will have little to no risk. The mach vendor piece may not work so well on c-esr102, but that's for for users anyway and should only run on c-central.

Back to Bug 1795709 Comment 4