Bug 1800529 Comment 2 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Original comment by
on 
Given the discussion around Bug 1815545, I'm thinking we need at least these two tests:
[ ] h1.1 ws fallback when no existing h2 conn (h2 and h2-ws server support shouldn't matter)
[ ] h1.1 ws fallback when existing h2 conn with h2 support, but no h2-ws support

Valentin, can you:
1. Confirm these make sense
2. Note additional tests we may need
Revision 1 by
on 
Given the discussion around Bug 1815545, I'm thinking we need at least these two tests:
[] h1.1 ws fallback when no existing h2 conn (h2 and h2-ws server support shouldn't matter)
[] h1.1 ws fallback when existing h2 conn with h2 support, but no h2-ws support

Valentin, can you:
1. Confirm these make sense
2. Note additional tests we may need
Revision 2 by
on 
Given the discussion around Bug 1815545, I'm thinking we need at least these two tests:
* h1.1 ws fallback when no existing h2 conn (h2 and h2-ws server support shouldn't matter)
* h1.1 ws fallback when existing h2 conn with h2 support, but no h2-ws support

Valentin, can you:
1. Confirm these make sense
2. Note additional tests we may need

Back to Bug 1800529 Comment 2