If we ignore OOMs, bitflips and shutdown hangs then I think this is the top 1 crasher for 116 release. From a stability point of view it looks very interesting to take this patch for 117. Can you elaborate if you think that there could be a risk here [:tnikkel]? Thank you.
Bug 1809492 Comment 45 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
If we ignore OOMs, bitflips and shutdown hangs then I think this is the top 1 parent process crasher for 116 release. From a stability point of view it looks very interesting to take this patch for 117. Can you elaborate if you think that there could be a risk here [:tnikkel]? Thank you.
If we ignore OOMs, bitflips and shutdown hangs then I think this is the top 1 parent process crasher for 116 release. From a stability point of view it looks very interesting to take this patch for 117.0 and 115.2.0esr. Can you elaborate if you think that there could be a risk here [:tnikkel]? Thank you.
If we ignore OOMs, bitflips and shutdown hangs then I think this is the top 1 parent process crasher for 116 release. From a stability point of view it should be very interesting to take this patch for 117.0 and 115.2.0esr. Can you elaborate if you think that there could be a risk here [:tnikkel]? Thank you.
If we ignore OOMs, bitflips and shutdown hangs then I think this is a top parent process crasher for 116 release. From a stability point of view it should be very interesting to take this patch for 117.0 and 115.2.0esr. Can you elaborate if you think that there could be a risk here [:tnikkel]? Thank you.