(In reply to Yannis Juglaret from comment #2) > Hello. Thank you for the report! > > It seems that you did not use [the bootstrap script](https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/setup/windows_build.html) and are building instead from a github mirror? Ah yes, I used https://github.com/glandium/git-cinnabar/wiki/Mozilla:-A-git-workflow-for-Gecko-development. But what would be different with that? >Can you describe a bit the steps you follow to compile, since they seem to differ from the recommended ones? `./mach build` and that's all really. >Also, do you know what compiler is used in the end? Clang+MSVC. >If you replace the first line by the following and recompile, does it remove the failure? Unfortunately no. Interestingly it only fails once after build and re-running it does not show the same failure. `./mach build && ./mach run` thus always fail but `./mach build && ./mach run; ./mach run` is okay.
Bug 1819064 Comment 3 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Yannis Juglaret from comment #2) > Hello. Thank you for the report! > > It seems that you did not use [the bootstrap script](https://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/setup/windows_build.html) and are building instead from a github mirror? Ah yes, I used https://github.com/glandium/git-cinnabar/wiki/Mozilla:-A-git-workflow-for-Gecko-development. But what would be different with that? >Can you describe a bit the steps you follow to compile, since they seem to differ from the recommended ones? `./mach build` and that's all really. >Also, do you know what compiler is used in the end? Clang+MSVC. >If you replace the first line by the following and recompile, does it remove the failure? Unfortunately no. Interestingly it only fails once after build and re-running it does not show the same failure. `./mach build && ./mach run` thus always fail but `./mach build && (./mach run || ./mach run)` is okay.