My patch for bug 1833680 landed on the 115 branch. So any crash report on that branch and up should do for testing. But just now I generated two new crash reports on FF 118.0.1 using `about:crashparent` and `about:crashcontent`, on a machine with known kernel boot args (== `keepsyms=1 kernel_stack_pages=6`): bp-b96556e8-3940-4933-b697-33dfe0231009 bp-d8e0d008-5772-4cc6-af5a-fd8c00231009 And two more with known-empty kernel boot args (for which, as noted above, a value for "mac_boot_args" exists but is an empty string): bp-fda05677-0e5f-4ca8-8dc9-4376d0231009 bp-9da29222-7f12-414f-943f-8746a0231009 Is this enough?
Bug 1835881 Comment 7 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
My patch for bug 1833680 landed on the 115 branch. So any crash report on that branch and up should do for testing. But just now I generated two new crash reports on FF 118.0.1 using `about:crashparent` and `about:crashcontent`, on a machine with known kernel boot args (== `keepsyms=1 kernel_stack_pages=6`): bp-b96556e8-3940-4933-b697-33dfe0231009 bp-d8e0d008-5772-4cc6-af5a-fd8c00231009 And two more with known-absent kernel boot args (for which, as noted above, a value for "mac_boot_args" exists but is an empty string): bp-fda05677-0e5f-4ca8-8dc9-4376d0231009 bp-9da29222-7f12-414f-943f-8746a0231009 Is this enough?