Ah, but we did have 29 failures on **beta**. We should uplift Nathan's patch to beta to avoid spurious (and confusing/difficult-to-diagnose) test failures there.
Bug 1845221 Comment 46 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
Ah, but we did have 29 failures on **beta**. We should uplift Nathan's patch to beta to avoid spurious test failures there (which may be confusing/difficult-to-diagnose per comment 19)
Ah, but we did have 29 failures on **beta**. We should uplift Nathan's patch to beta to avoid spurious test failures there (which may be confusing/difficult-to-star per comment 19)