Bug 1854107 Comment 14 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5545#section-3.3.14(In reply to Branislav Klocok from comment #13)
> Funny thing, when I check ho the file looks on server I got this:
> TZOFFSETFROM:+10000
> TZOFFSETTO:+20000
> 
> So to mee it seems that TB is putting too many zeros there and then Icewarp is reading and saving it wrong.

The leading zero is require per specification (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5545#section-3.3.14 and https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5545#section-3.3.12). The "00" for the seconds is optional but not against the specification.
(In reply to Branislav Klocok from comment #13)
> Funny thing, when I check ho the file looks on server I got this:
> TZOFFSETFROM:+10000
> TZOFFSETTO:+20000
> 
> So to mee it seems that TB is putting too many zeros there and then Icewarp is reading and saving it wrong.

The leading zero is require per specification (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5545#section-3.3.14 and https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5545#section-3.3.12). The "00" for the seconds is optional but not against the specification.

Back to Bug 1854107 Comment 14