Bugzilla

(In reply to Henrik Skupin [:whimboo][⌚️UTC+2] from comment #69)
> Hi Daniel, could someone maybe have a look at this Windows-only failure?

TYLin's got the most context on this test -- passing along needinfo to him (though I think he's got reduced availability this week so he might not get back right away).

> With the fix for bug 1800035 the number of failures increased quiet a lot now.

(Just to clarify -- bug 1800035 was essentially causing this failure [and others] to be papered-over/under-reported, correct?  i.e. it didn't increase the actual frequency of this failure, but it increased the frequency of it getting correctly highlighted/reported in a human-readable way in test logs?)

I do see an increase in comment 68 vs. earlier comments -- looks like it's on the order of ~2x the previous amount of volume.  Comment 68 has 41 failures, whereas previous weeks had ~20 failures (plus or minus ~8, depending on the week).

(In reply to Henrik Skupin [:whimboo][⌚️UTC+2] from comment #69)
> Hi Daniel, could someone maybe have a look at this Windows-only failure?

TYLin's got the most context on this test -- passing along needinfo to him (though I think he's got reduced availability this week so he might not get back right away).

> With the fix for bug 1800035 the number of failures increased quiet a lot now.

(Just to clarify -- bug 1800035 was essentially causing this failure [and others] to be papered-over/under-reported, correct?  i.e. it didn't increase the actual frequency of this failure, but it increased the frequency of it getting correctly highlighted/reported in a human-readable way in test logs, and hence making it into the stats here.)

I do see an increase in comment 68 vs. earlier comments -- looks like it's on the order of ~2x the previous amount of volume.  Comment 68 has 41 failures, whereas previous weeks had ~20 failures (plus or minus ~8, depending on the week).