Actually I guess the element has the same class "PRCEm" in Firefox-pretending-to-be-Chrome, too. The key difference is that the **style rule for that class (in an inline `<style>` element) is different** -- it's missing the above-quoted troublesome `border-image` declaration. So presumably Google should just fix whatever's inserting that `border-image` into that style rule when viewed in a browser with a Firefox UA string.
Bug 1869335 Comment 5 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
Actually I guess the element has the same class "PRCEm" in Firefox-pretending-to-be-Chrome, too. The key difference is that the **style rule for that class (in an inline `<style>` element) is different** -- it's missing the above-quoted troublesome `border-image` declaration. So presumably Google should just fix whatever's inserting that `border-image` into that style rule when viewed in a browser with a Firefox UA string. [edited comment 3 to clarify]