(In reply to Timea Zsoldos [:zstimi/tzsoldos], Desktop QA from comment #24) > From the beginning I didn't manage to reproduce this issue on nightly (nor on nightly 118.0a1), so I can't validate the fix on latest nightly 123.0a1. > Is there any way I could check that the bug is fixed in latest nightly 123.0a1? Sorry for the confusion. I don't believe there's a way to validate this on Nightly as the issue is not reproducible on Nightly (unless there's a way to get valid language packs?) I have a [beta patch](https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D198315) that has the same fix and is what I'd like to be uplifted and ultimately verified as it's the same solution but reproducible on beta. cc'ing Shane/Ed in case there's a way to validate this on Nightly that I'm not aware of.
Bug 1873019 Comment 25 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Timea Zsoldos [:zstimi/tzsoldos], Desktop QA from comment #24) > From the beginning I didn't manage to reproduce this issue on nightly (nor on nightly 118.0a1), so I can't validate the fix on latest nightly 123.0a1. > Is there any way I could check that the bug is fixed in latest nightly 123.0a1? Sorry for the confusion. I don't believe there's a way to validate this on Nightly as the issue is not reproducible on Nightly (unless there's a way to get valid language packs?) I have a [beta patch](https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D198315) that has the same fix and is what I'd like to be uplifted and ultimately verified as it's the same solution but reproducible on beta. cc'ing Shane/Ed in case there's a way to validate this on Nightly that I'm not aware of.