After [discussing](https://matrix.to/#/!wKNaTuhRJSXtjUVpfk:matrix.org/$Q6oTY4ntDwDmOpDRjtXgmEEoCc5KmKBseBG3LnmjRPc?via=matrix.org&via=mozilla.org&via=igalia.com) the `implementation-status` WPT property with :jgraham, it turns out that the only valid values relevant to use are `implementing` and `backlog` (before, I thought a `default` value was in the set of valid values). We might want to use a `tag` value to differentiate more than 2 stages later, but I think we need to focus on having 2 stages right now if that's easily achievable with `implementation-status`. Will move forward with `implementing` and `backlog` for now.
Bug 1873687 Comment 4 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
After [discussing](https://matrix.to/#/!wKNaTuhRJSXtjUVpfk:matrix.org/$Q6oTY4ntDwDmOpDRjtXgmEEoCc5KmKBseBG3LnmjRPc?via=matrix.org&via=mozilla.org&via=igalia.com) the `implementation-status` WPT property with :jgraham, it turns out that the only valid values relevant to use are `implementing` and `backlog` (before, I thought a `default` value was in the set of valid values due to a docs. issue). We might want to use a `tag` value to differentiate more than 2 stages later, but I think we need to focus on having 2 stages right now if that's easily achievable with `implementation-status`. Will move forward with `implementing` and `backlog` for now.