Bug 1874715 Comment 15 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

(In reply to Kai Engert (:KaiE:) from comment #14)
> Independently of the decision to involve the user or not, we'll require the suggested functionality from RNP.
> 

Sure, generation of custom key signatures is a long awaited task, and implementation started via this PR: https://github.com/rnpgp/rnp/pull/2160/files

Basically, it is planned to look like the following for the FFI caller:
```
rnp_key_signature_clone(); // or rnp_key_direct_signature_create()/rnp_key_certification_signature_create().
rnp_key_signature_set_features();
...rnp_key_signature_set_something()...;
rnp_key_signature_sign();
```
(In reply to Kai Engert (:KaiE:) from comment #14)
> Independently of the decision to involve the user or not, we'll require the suggested functionality from RNP.
> 

Sure, generation of custom key signatures is a long awaited functionality, and implementation started via this PR: https://github.com/rnpgp/rnp/pull/2160/files

Basically, it is planned to look like the following for the FFI caller:
```
rnp_key_signature_clone(); // or rnp_key_direct_signature_create()/rnp_key_certification_signature_create().
rnp_key_signature_set_features();
...rnp_key_signature_set_something()...;
rnp_key_signature_sign();
```

Back to Bug 1874715 Comment 15