(In reply to Kai Engert (:KaiE:) from comment #14) > Independently of the decision to involve the user or not, we'll require the suggested functionality from RNP. > Sure, generation of custom key signatures is a long awaited task, and implementation started via this PR: https://github.com/rnpgp/rnp/pull/2160/files Basically, it is planned to look like the following for the FFI caller: ``` rnp_key_signature_clone(); // or rnp_key_direct_signature_create()/rnp_key_certification_signature_create(). rnp_key_signature_set_features(); ...rnp_key_signature_set_something()...; rnp_key_signature_sign(); ```
Bug 1874715 Comment 15 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Kai Engert (:KaiE:) from comment #14) > Independently of the decision to involve the user or not, we'll require the suggested functionality from RNP. > Sure, generation of custom key signatures is a long awaited functionality, and implementation started via this PR: https://github.com/rnpgp/rnp/pull/2160/files Basically, it is planned to look like the following for the FFI caller: ``` rnp_key_signature_clone(); // or rnp_key_direct_signature_create()/rnp_key_certification_signature_create(). rnp_key_signature_set_features(); ...rnp_key_signature_set_something()...; rnp_key_signature_sign(); ```