(In reply to ngook.kong from comment #26) > We will take this suggestion into consideration for no-revocation events. Hmm. My understanding is that what Wayne describes is a requirement of the incident reporting process, and not a suggestion or optional activity. Does Entrust disagree?
Bug 1886532 Comment 27 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to ngook.kong from comment #26) > We will take this suggestion into consideration for no-revocation events. Hmm. My understanding is that what Tim describes is a requirement of the incident reporting process, and not a suggestion or optional activity. Does Entrust disagree? [e: fixed name]