Bug 1888676 Comment 4 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

I will be continuing to look at this but, from what I can tell, there _is_ a regression from my commit on the pretty-print tests on macOS, but it is not nearly as significant as shown in the alert above.

I used _./mach perf --alert 41942 --rebuild 20_ on both my commit, and the commit right before it, to run these tests again in CI. Because I don't know what I'm doing, that gave me two comparison reports - one [comparing my commit against itself](https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perfherder/comparesubtest?originalProject=try&newProject=try&newRevision=f79001ef195c9928c25a9d9d9d03e775c0d9fa72&originalSignature=4765722&newSignature=4765722&framework=12&application=firefox&originalRevision=28146d83527d22e112a2621357d18107bcfe65e3&page=1&filter=pretty&replicates=1) and another [doing the same for the previous commit](https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perfherder/comparesubtest?originalProject=try&newProject=try&newRevision=9df7a5191e7bda0e013274f6a40cbebaf47c44c0&originalSignature=4765722&newSignature=4765722&framework=12&application=firefox&originalRevision=42f1905f7cd297928f5d240ac9d27190f2cbfb37&page=1&filter=pretty&replicates=1).

If you look _between_ those two comparison reports, it looks like both of those tests went from ~8500ms to ~8800ms, which is about a 3.5% regression.
I will be continuing to look at this but, from what I can tell, there _is_ a regression from my commit on the pretty-print tests on macOS, but it is not nearly as significant as shown in the alert above.

I used _./mach perf --alert 41942 --rebuild 20_ on both my commit, and the commit right before it, to run these tests again in CI. Because I don't know what I'm doing, that gave me two comparison reports - one [comparing my commit against itself](https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perfherder/comparesubtest?originalProject=try&newProject=try&newRevision=f79001ef195c9928c25a9d9d9d03e775c0d9fa72&originalSignature=4765722&newSignature=4765722&framework=12&application=firefox&originalRevision=28146d83527d22e112a2621357d18107bcfe65e3&page=1&filter=pretty&replicates=1) and another [doing the same for the previous commit](https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perfherder/comparesubtest?originalProject=try&newProject=try&newRevision=9df7a5191e7bda0e013274f6a40cbebaf47c44c0&originalSignature=4765722&newSignature=4765722&framework=12&application=firefox&originalRevision=42f1905f7cd297928f5d240ac9d27190f2cbfb37&page=1&filter=pretty&replicates=1).

If you look _between_ those two comparison reports, it looks like both of those tests went from ~8500ms to ~8800ms, which is about a 3.5% regression.

The graphs from all of those runs are still tri-modal and visually they look almost identical. I'm not sure that that difference is even really related to the change or just to the randomness of the modality.

Back to Bug 1888676 Comment 4