Bug 1896955 Comment 15 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

(In reply to Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM] from comment #13)
> Should we close this out?

Yes, given the the low crash rate since 126.0.1 I think we can close this off.

(In reply to Chris Peterson [:cpeterson] from comment #14)
> Since 127 RC is next week and Donal says 126.0.1 reduced the crash rate in Fx126, we probably don't need to uplift the fix for bug 1841578 to Beta 127. (Plus, Pascal already set bug 1841578's status-firefox127=wontfix.)

Chris, thanks, yep sounds like we don't need to uplift. (In reply to Chris Peterson [:cpeterson] from comment #14). NI'd you for visibility.
(In reply to Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM] from comment #13)
> Should we close this out?

Yes, given the the low crash rate since 126.0.1 I think we can close this off.

(In reply to Chris Peterson [:cpeterson] from comment #14)
> Since 127 RC is next week and Donal says 126.0.1 reduced the crash rate in Fx126, we probably don't need to uplift the fix for bug 1841578 to Beta 127. (Plus, Pascal already set bug 1841578's status-firefox127=wontfix.)

Chris, thanks, yep sounds like we don't need to uplift. NI'd you for visibility.

Back to Bug 1896955 Comment 15