(In reply to Daniel Holbert [:dholbert] from comment #17) > We can consider this to be a regression from bug 1850834 ...which I suppose does mean 128 is affected, actually. Brad, would you mind nominating this for 128 uplift? It'll likely be unnecessary once bug 1902156 gets uplifted there, but it's a good belt-and-suspenders improvement to avoid crashes when using layout devtools on certain types of content (like the first testcase in bug 1902156).
Bug 1901233 Comment 18 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Daniel Holbert [:dholbert] from comment #17) > We can consider this to be a regression from bug 1850834 ...which I suppose does mean 128 is affected, actually. Brad, would you mind nominating this for 128 uplift? It'll likely be unnecessary once bug 1902156 gets uplifted there, but it's a good belt-and-suspenders improvement to avoid crashes when using layout devtools on certain types of content (like the first testcase in bug 1902156 which I wrote to be an analogous web-content/regular-devtools-only version of the browser-toolbox STR here).