Bug 1901411 Comment 9 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Original comment by
on 
Actually, the assertion in the spec comes from https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2413
which is reflected to SpiderMonkey in bug 1724123, version 97.
I've confirmed the crash happens on 97, but not on 96.

Then, I don't see the corresponding update in v8 code nor JSC code, so I assume the problematic change is not reflected there.
Revision 1 by
on 
Actually, the assertion in the spec comes from https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2413
which is reflected to SpiderMonkey in bug 1724123, version 97.
I've confirmed the crash happens on 97, but not on 96.

Then, I don't see the corresponding update in v8 code nor JSC code (at least the building blocks I see in their code seems to be based on ECMAScript 2021's abstract operations' names), so I assume the problematic change is not reflected there.
Revision 2 by
on 
Actually, the assertion in the spec comes from https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2413
which is reflected to SpiderMonkey in bug 1724123, version 97.
I've confirmed the crash happens on 97, but not on 96.

Then, I don't see the corresponding update in v8 code nor JSC code (at least the building blocks I see in their code seems to be based on ECMAScript 2021's abstract operations' names which is before https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2413), so I assume the problematic change is not reflected there.

Back to Bug 1901411 Comment 9