Mayank: Is there a reason you've marked this bug as a blocker of bug 1887287 when this one is already `RESOLVED`? It usually doesn't make sense. Did you mean to mark this one as the regressor, maybe?
Bug 1906679 Comment 9 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
Mayank: Is there a reason you've marked this bug as a blocker of bug 1887287 when this one is already `RESOLVED`? It usually doesn't make sense. Did you mean to mark this one as the regressor, maybe? EDIT: Ah, I see [bug 1887287, comment 7](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1887287#c7) now, which suggests that that bug might be closed. Carry on, sorry for the noise!
Mayank: Is there a reason you've marked this bug as a blocker of bug 1887287 when this one is already `RESOLVED`? It usually doesn't make sense. Did you mean to mark this one as the regressor, maybe? EDIT: Ah, I see [bug 1887287, comment 7](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1887287#c7) now, which suggests that that bug might be closed. Carry on, sorry for the noise! Will leave the NI to help with follow-up, but otherwise, I'm satisfied with the current trajectory of conversation around the linkage. 🙂