(In reply to Tarek Ziadé (:tarek) from comment #7) > 10 minutes and 4GB is a no go for our users. Oh, indeed, 10 mins / 4GB is unreasonable in any scenario. > is it possible to provide already compiled versions so they skip that step ? We don't have any (simple) way to do that, but .. > If not, would it be possible for now to run that specific WASM with Ion deactivated? In case the fix takes a long time to happen since it's upstream .. yeah, something like that would be easy to do. The downside would be that you would get performance of 60%-70% compared to that op Ion compiled code. Is that acceptable? Are these .wasms performance-critical?
Bug 1916442 Comment 8 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Tarek Ziadé (:tarek) from comment #7) > 10 minutes and 4GB is a no go for our users. Oh, indeed, 10 mins / 4GB is unreasonable in any scenario. > is it possible to provide already compiled versions so they skip that step ? We don't have any (simple) way to do that, but .. > If not, would it be possible for now to run that specific WASM with Ion deactivated? In case the fix takes a long time to happen since it's upstream .. yeah, something like that would be easy to do. The downside would be that you would get performance of 60%-70% compared to that of Ion compiled code. Is that acceptable? Are these .wasms performance-critical?