Bug 1917594 Comment 16 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

:kshampur

Most of the MacStadium Macs have a fit-Headless 4K dongle attached (see: https://fit-iot.com/web/product/fit-headless-4k/).

In mdc1, however, some Macs use an alternative display emulator (example: https://www.amazon.com/Headless-Display-Emulator-Headless-1920x1080-Generation/dp/B06XT1Z9TF?th=1). Specifically, Macs such as macmini-r8-103, macmini-r8-188, and macmini-r8-281 (randomly selected from your list) have this type of dongle, with their resolution set to 3840x2160.

Other machines are reporting connections to a VE228H monitor, which appears to be routed through a patch panel to an Asus display, though the exact configuration is uncertain to me at the moment.
:kshampur

Most of the MacStadium Macs have a fit-Headless 4K dongle attached (see: https://fit-iot.com/web/product/fit-headless-4k/).

In mdc1, however, some Macs use an alternative display emulator (example: https://www.amazon.com/Headless-Display-Emulator-Headless-1920x1080-Generation/dp/B06XT1Z9TF?th=1). Specifically, Macs such as macmini-r8-103, macmini-r8-188, and macmini-r8-281 (randomly selected from your list) have this type of dongle, with their resolution set to 3840x2160.

Other machines are reporting connections to a VE228H monitor, which appears to be routed through a patch panel to an Asus display, though the exact configuration is uncertain to me at the moment. To make it more confusing, macmini-r8-93 (from list) is setup like this (res 4096x2160) and is still having the issue.

Is there a machine I can look at that has passed this test recently to try to compare?
:kshampur

Most of the MacStadium Macs have a fit-Headless 4K dongle attached (see: https://fit-iot.com/web/product/fit-headless-4k/).

In mdc1, however, some Macs use an alternative display emulator (example: https://www.amazon.com/Headless-Display-Emulator-Headless-1920x1080-Generation/dp/B06XT1Z9TF?th=1). Specifically, Macs such as macmini-r8-103, macmini-r8-188, and macmini-r8-281 (randomly selected from your list) have this type of dongle, with their resolution set to 3840x2160.

One other machine is reporting connections to a VE228H monitor, which appears to be routed through a patch panel to an Asus display, though the exact configuration is uncertain to me at the moment. To make it more confusing, macmini-r8-93 (from list) is setup like this (res 4096x2160) and is still having the issue.

Is there a machine I can look at that has passed this test recently to try to compare?

Back to Bug 1917594 Comment 16