Bug 1917594 Comment 19 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

(In reply to Ryan Curran from comment #18)
> Ok from that try link it sounds like you're saying macmini-r8-134 recently passed the test
> 
> That machine is configured with this dongle https://www.amazon.com/Headless-Display-Emulator-Headless-1920x1080-Generation/dp/B06XT1Z9TF?th=1
> 
> And its screen resolution is set to 1920x1080...which is much lower than the resolutions that failed the test (i think)

interesting, also 134 doesn't show up in Joel's list.
Though, resolution =/= refresh rate, but I don't know enough about these headless display emulators

Also curious about mdc1.macmini-r8-16 and ,dc1.macmini-r8-103, which displayed *no* refresh rate, what kind of (headless?) monitor is that set up with?
(In reply to Ryan Curran from comment #18)
> Ok from that try link it sounds like you're saying macmini-r8-134 recently passed the test
> 
> That machine is configured with this dongle https://www.amazon.com/Headless-Display-Emulator-Headless-1920x1080-Generation/dp/B06XT1Z9TF?th=1
> 
> And its screen resolution is set to 1920x1080...which is much lower than the resolutions that failed the test (i think)

interesting thanks for looking into it.. also 134 doesn't show up in Joel's list (expectedly)
Though, resolution =/= refresh rate, but I don't know enough about these headless display emulators

Also curious about mdc1.macmini-r8-16 and mdc1.macmini-r8-103, which displayed *no* refresh rate, what kind of (headless?) monitor is that set up with? (though 103 does show up on Joel's list)
(In reply to Ryan Curran from comment #18)
> Ok from that try link it sounds like you're saying macmini-r8-134 recently passed the test
> 
> That machine is configured with this dongle https://www.amazon.com/Headless-Display-Emulator-Headless-1920x1080-Generation/dp/B06XT1Z9TF?th=1
> 
> And its screen resolution is set to 1920x1080...which is much lower than the resolutions that failed the test (i think)

interesting thanks for looking into it.. also 134 doesn't show up in Joel's list (expectedly)
Though, resolution =/= refresh rate, but I don't know enough about these headless display emulators

Also curious about mdc1.macmini-r8-16 which displayed *no* refresh rate, what kind of (headless?) monitor is that set up with?

Back to Bug 1917594 Comment 19