Bug 1926802 Comment 3 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

The problem here in [HTMLImageElement::SetLazyLoading](https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/18f09bdf36a62ea7079c018301f1d257f71f655b/dom/html/HTMLImageElement.cpp#1200-1207);

```
  // If scripting is disabled don't do lazy load.                               
  // https://whatpr.org/html/3752/images.html#updating-the-image-data           
  //                                                                            
  // Same for printing.                                                         
  Document* doc = OwnerDoc();                                                   
  if (!doc->IsScriptEnabled() || doc->IsStaticDocument()) {                     
    return;                                                                     
  } 
```

Unfortunately at that time, when the template's innerHTML is set, the `!docu->IsScriptEnabled()` false. That's the cause. We need to tweak the condition.

I'd defer it to DOM team.
The problem here in [HTMLImageElement::SetLazyLoading](https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/18f09bdf36a62ea7079c018301f1d257f71f655b/dom/html/HTMLImageElement.cpp#1200-1207);

```
  // If scripting is disabled don't do lazy load.                               
  // https://whatpr.org/html/3752/images.html#updating-the-image-data           
  //                                                                            
  // Same for printing.                                                         
  Document* doc = OwnerDoc();                                                   
  if (!doc->IsScriptEnabled() || doc->IsStaticDocument()) {                     
    return;                                                                     
  } 
```

Unfortunately at that time, when the template's innerHTML is set, the `!doc->IsScriptEnabled()` is true. That's the cause. We need to tweak the condition.

I'd defer it to DOM team.

Back to Bug 1926802 Comment 3