I don't understand and am sincerely confused. Why do have have to build in a patch and run a non-descript, untrusted binary file to test what is nominally a sec-high bug? This seems somewhat sketchy.
Bug 1929911 Comment 5 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
I don't understand and am sincerely confused. Why do I have to build in a patch and run a non-descript, untrusted binary file to test what is nominally a sec-high bug? This seems somewhat sketchy.
I don't understand and am sincerely confused. Why do I have to build in a patch and run a non-descript, untrusted binary file to test what is nominally a sec-high bug? This seems somewhat sketchy. I would request a safer, more trustworthy testcase before I feel confident in any way engaging with this?