I rechecked the page, and they must have changed something because the profiles are quite different now. To create the 99x99 matrix Nightly: https://share.firefox.dev/3DQFn65 (8.5s) ->JS heavy profile now. Chrome: https://share.firefox.dev/4j93BIT (10s) To calculate, it takes less than a second now. There is a slowness when opening all the matrices, which is a JS bug. I will file it separately. Daniel, is there anything to investigate/improve in this profile?
Bug 1940386 Comment 3 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
I rechecked the page, and they must have changed something because the profiles are quite different now. To create the 99x99 matrix Nightly: https://share.firefox.dev/3DQFn65 (8.5s) ->JS heavy profile now. Chrome: https://share.firefox.dev/4j93BIT (10s) To calculate, it takes less than a second now. There is a slowness when opening all the matrices, which is a JS bug. I will file it separately. Daniel, is there anything to investigate/improve in this profile? (the 2x99x99 preference reading is still present)
I rechecked the page, and they must have changed something because the profiles are quite different now. To create the 99x99 matrix Nightly: https://share.firefox.dev/3DQFn65 (8.5s) ->JS heavy profile now. Chrome: https://share.firefox.dev/4j93BIT (10s) To calculate, it takes less than a second now. There is a slowness when opening all the matrices, which is a JS bug. I will file it separately. Daniel, is there anything to investigate/improve in this profile? (the preference is still read 2x99x99 times)
I rechecked the page, and they must have changed something because the profiles are quite different now. To create the 99x99 matrix Nightly: https://share.firefox.dev/3DQFn65 (8.5s) ->JS heavy profile now. Chrome: https://share.firefox.dev/4j93BIT (10s) To calculate, it takes less than a second now. There is a slowness when clicking on "show all solutions", which is a JS bug. I will file it separately. Daniel, is there anything to investigate/improve in this profile? (the preference is still read 2x99x99 times)