Bug 1991105 Comment 1 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

@David, don't forget to add `dev-doc-needed` and a release note request for things that should be documented and mentioned in the release notes.

[Why is this notable]: Part of Interop 2025 and a long wished-for feature.
[Affects Firefox for Android]: yes
[Suggested wording]: The [`@scope`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@scope) rule is now supported, allowing authors to restrict styling to a subtree of the DOM. This avoids having to write overly-specific selectors.
[Links (documentation, blog post, etc)]:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@scope
@David, don't forget to add `dev-doc-needed` and a release note request for things that should be documented and mentioned in the release notes.

[Why is this notable]: Part of [Interop 2025](https://wpt.fyi/interop-2025?feature=interop-2025-scope) and a long wished-for feature.
[Affects Firefox for Android]: yes
[Suggested wording]: The [`@scope`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@scope) rule is now supported, allowing authors to restrict styling to a subtree of the DOM. This avoids having to write overly-specific selectors.
[Links (documentation, blog post, etc)]:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@scope
@David, don't forget to add `dev-doc-needed` and a release note request for things that should be documented and mentioned in the release notes.

[Why is this notable]: Part of [Interop 2025](https://wpt.fyi/interop-2025?feature=interop-2025-scope) and a long wished-for feature by authors.
[Affects Firefox for Android]: yes
[Suggested wording]: The [`@scope`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@scope) rule is now supported, allowing authors to restrict styling to a subtree of the DOM. This avoids having to write overly-specific selectors.
[Links (documentation, blog post, etc)]:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@scope

Back to Bug 1991105 Comment 1