Bug 2011260 Comment 1 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Original comment by
on 
What should be stripped? If debug symbols, I hope that they're provided in a `.*-debuginfo` package:

> ~~~yaml
> RokeJulianLockhart@Beedell:~$ dnf5 search 'firefox*debuginfo'
> Updating and loading repositories:
> Repositories loaded.
> Matched fields: name
>  firefox-debuginfo.x86_64       Debug information for package firefox
> RokeJulianLockhart@Beedell:~$ dnf5 search 'firefox-nightly'
> Updating and loading repositories:
> Repositories loaded.
> Matched fields: name (exact)
>  firefox-nightly.aarch64        Mozilla Firefox Nightly
>  firefox-nightly.x86_64 Mozilla Firefox Nightly
> ~~~
Revision 1 by
on 
What should be stripped? If debug symbols, I hope that they're provided in a `.*-debuginfo` package. My concern is that, currently, they're not provided (so the user is reliant upon DebugInfoD):

> ~~~yaml
> RokeJulianLockhart@Beedell:~$ dnf5 search 'firefox*debuginfo'
> Updating and loading repositories:
> Repositories loaded.
> Matched fields: name
>  firefox-debuginfo.x86_64       Debug information for package firefox
> RokeJulianLockhart@Beedell:~$ dnf5 search 'firefox-nightly'
> Updating and loading repositories:
> Repositories loaded.
> Matched fields: name (exact)
>  firefox-nightly.aarch64        Mozilla Firefox Nightly
>  firefox-nightly.x86_64 Mozilla Firefox Nightly
> ~~~

Back to Bug 2011260 Comment 1