This bug itself, for the specific regression caused by bug 2013142 is invalid in my opinion. Bug 2013142 enabled rust code that had been enabled with the previous C++ library, so it was expected to increase, the new baseline was below the old baseline, so that is actually a win. There are two other regressions that happened afterwards though, and those have not been tracked down. I will leave it up to others to potentially deal with those.
Bug 2016471 Comment 12 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
This bug itself, for the specific regression caused by bug 2013142 is invalid in my opinion. Bug 2013142 enabled rust code that had been enabled with the previous C++ library, so it was expected to increase, the new baseline was below the old baseline (the removal of the C++ code having dropped the baseline previous to bug 2013142), so that is actually a win. There are two other regressions that happened afterwards though, and those have not been tracked down. I will leave it up to others to potentially deal with those.
This bug itself, for the specific regression caused by bug 2013142 is invalid in my opinion. Bug 2013142 enabled rust code that had been enabled with the previous C++ library, so it was expected to increase, the new baseline was below the old baseline (the removal of the C++ code having dropped the interim numbers before bug 2013142), so that is actually a win. There are two other regressions that happened afterwards though, and those have not been tracked down. I will leave it up to others to potentially deal with those.