Bug 2023621 Comment 6 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Thanks :dholbert for the ping. I disagree about the regressor. I suppose that you used the test case from comment 0 for the regression, but with the simplified test case from comment 2, I can reproduce the issue in e.g. Firefox 116a1. This suggests that the real underlying issue is older than the regression range, and most likely something in the regression range just changed the ways in which the real bug can manifest. Nonetheless, your reduced test case was super helpful as a starting point and I have a patch to offer.
Thanks :dholbert for the ping. I disagree about the regressor. I suppose that you used the test case from comment 0 for testing the regression, but with the simplified test case from comment 2, I can reproduce the issue in e.g. Firefox 116a1. This suggests that the real underlying issue is older than the regression range, and most likely something in the regression range just changed the ways in which the real bug can manifest. Nonetheless, your reduced test case was super helpful as a starting point and I have a patch to offer.
Thanks :dholbert for the ping. I disagree about the regressor. I suppose that you used the test case from comment 0 for testing the regression, but with the simplified test case from comment 2, I can reproduce the issue in e.g. Firefox 115.0.3. This suggests that the real underlying issue is older than the regression range, and most likely something in the regression range just changed the ways in which the real bug can manifest. Nonetheless, your reduced test case was super helpful as a starting point and I have a patch to offer.

Back to Bug 2023621 Comment 6