Bug 1222046 Comment 13 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

I'm looking for something more like this; Tb sends the server its version ID and then the server, if it's nice,  responds with its (line may not be contiguous in log):

[26398:Unnamed thread 0x7270fdf7d700]: I/IMAP 0x7270fba8b000:mobile.charter.net:A:SendData: 5 ID ("name" "Thunderbird" "version" "60.4.0")
[26398:Unnamed thread 0x7270fdf7d700]: I/IMAP 0x7270fba8b000:mobile.charter.net:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * ID ("name" "Email Mx" "version" "M.9.00.023.01.5 201-2473-194" "vendor" "Openwave Messaging" "support-url" "http://support.openwave.com" "date" "Wed Nov 14 12:28:00 EST 2018")
[26398:Unnamed thread 0x7270fdf7d700]: I/IMAP 0x7270fba8b000:mobile.charter.net:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: 5 OK ID completed

The IMAP4rev1 is just the imap RFC version that the server conforms to. Almost all say that. The server type also sometimes appears after the capability string is sent, but not always. The ID response is better but not all servers support ID command (not nice).
I'm looking for something more like this; Tb sends the server its version ID and then the server, if it's nice,  responds with its (lines may not be contiguous in log):

[26398:Unnamed thread 0x7270fdf7d700]: I/IMAP 0x7270fba8b000:mobile.charter.net:A:SendData: 5 ID ("name" "Thunderbird" "version" "60.4.0")
[26398:Unnamed thread 0x7270fdf7d700]: I/IMAP 0x7270fba8b000:mobile.charter.net:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: * ID ("name" "Email Mx" "version" "M.9.00.023.01.5 201-2473-194" "vendor" "Openwave Messaging" "support-url" "http://support.openwave.com" "date" "Wed Nov 14 12:28:00 EST 2018")
[26398:Unnamed thread 0x7270fdf7d700]: I/IMAP 0x7270fba8b000:mobile.charter.net:A:CreateNewLineFromSocket: 5 OK ID completed

The IMAP4rev1 is just the imap RFC version that the server conforms to. Almost all say that. The server type also sometimes appears after the capability string is sent, but not always. The ID response is better but not all servers support ID command (not nice).

Back to Bug 1222046 Comment 13