I think maybe this issue has gone away -- I'm guessing as part of our non-native theme conversion, maybe (bug 1535761), since this was due in part to the particulars of certain gtk themes (per comment 0). I just retested Ubuntu 16.10 using `data:text/html,<select><option>1<option>2<option>3 - an old Nightly from the day that I posted comment 6 (when we were just shipping Nighlty with this contrast issue by default, before the `dom.forms.select.customstyling` pref was introduced) - ...vs. current Nightly with the `customstyling` pref flipped to `true` And I confirmed that I could reproduce the issue in old Nightly (the unselection options are grayed-out and invisible), vs. no such issue in current Nightly with the pref flipped to `true`.
Bug 1338283 Comment 20 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
I think maybe this issue has gone away -- I'm guessing as part of our non-native theme conversion, maybe (bug 1535761), since this was due in part to the particulars of certain gtk themes (per comment 0). I just retested Ubuntu 16.10 using `data:text/html,<select><option>1<option>2<option>3` - an old Nightly from the day that I posted comment 6 (when we were just shipping Nighlty with this contrast issue by default, before the `dom.forms.select.customstyling` pref was introduced) - ...vs. current Nightly with the `customstyling` pref flipped to `true` And I confirmed that I could reproduce the issue in old Nightly (the unselection options are grayed-out and invisible), vs. no such issue in current Nightly with the pref flipped to `true`.