(In reply to Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) from comment #3) > Birtles, the animation test looks reasonable, but it doesn't match: > > https://drafts.csswg.org/web-animations/#calculating-computed-keyframes > > In particular, the rule (4), which this test tests, is useless, since (3) resolves any conflict between the two properties by sorting by name. It seems the spec doesn't mention logical or physical in (1)~(3), so if (1)~(3) are for general cases, this test may have problems and we may need to update Gecko, as you mentioned. Brian is on PTO this week, so we can file a bug for this.
Bug 1519944 Comment 5 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) from comment #3) > Birtles, the animation test looks reasonable, but it doesn't match: > > https://drafts.csswg.org/web-animations/#calculating-computed-keyframes > > In particular, the rule (4), which this test tests, is useless, since (3) resolves any conflict between the two properties by sorting by name. It seems the spec doesn't mention logical or physical in (1) - (3), so if (1) - (3) are for general cases, this test may have problems and we may need to update Gecko, as you mentioned. Brian is on PTO this week, so we can file a bug for this.
(In reply to Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) from comment #3) > Birtles, the animation test looks reasonable, but it doesn't match: > > https://drafts.csswg.org/web-animations/#calculating-computed-keyframes > > In particular, the rule (4), which this test tests, is useless, since (3) resolves any conflict between the two properties by sorting by name. It seems the spec doesn't mention logical or physical in (1)(2)(3), so if (1)(2)(3) are for general cases, this test may have problems and we may need to update Gecko, as you mentioned. Brian is on PTO this week, so we can file a bug for this.