Bug 1520722 Comment 0 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Load the attached test case (modified from the test in bug 1516737). This needs bug 1516739 fixed, or it crashes immediately.

Expected result:
The page should render some text like "ltr".

Actual result:
The page is blank, and there are some warnings like

[2064, Main Thread] ###!!! ASSERTION: frame tree not empty, but caller reported complete status: 'aSubtreeRoot->GetPrevInFlow()', file /home/aethanyc/Projects/gecko-dev/layout/base/nsLayoutUtils.cpp, line 7480
[2064, Main Thread] ###!!! ASSERTION: frame tree not empty, but caller reported complete status: 'start == end || IsInLetterFrame(aSubtreeRoot)', file /home/aethanyc/Projects/gecko-dev/layout/base/nsLayoutUtils.cpp, line 7494


When loading the test by `GECKO_FRAMECTOR_DEBUG_FLAGS=really-noisy-content-updates ./mach run`, I notice that the full frame tree was constructed correctly, but later the nsColumnSetFrame's continuation is somehow being deleted due to some bidi resolution.
Load the attached test case (modified from the test in bug 1516737). This needs bug 1516739 fixed, or it crashes immediately.

Expected result:
The page should render some text like "ltr".

Actual result:
The page is blank, and there are some warnings like

```
[2064, Main Thread] ###!!! ASSERTION: frame tree not empty, but caller reported complete status: 'aSubtreeRoot->GetPrevInFlow()', file /home/aethanyc/Projects/gecko-dev/layout/base/nsLayoutUtils.cpp, line 7480
[2064, Main Thread] ###!!! ASSERTION: frame tree not empty, but caller reported complete status: 'start == end || IsInLetterFrame(aSubtreeRoot)', file /home/aethanyc/Projects/gecko-dev/layout/base/nsLayoutUtils.cpp, line 7494
```

When loading the test by `GECKO_FRAMECTOR_DEBUG_FLAGS=really-noisy-content-updates ./mach run`, I notice that the full frame tree was constructed correctly, but later the nsColumnSetFrame's continuation is somehow being deleted due to some bidi resolution.

Back to Bug 1520722 Comment 0