### Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request * **Feature/Bug causing the regression**: Bug 1516442 * **User impact if declined**: a duplicate/mismatching item appears at the top of the application/handler list in the preferences when sorting or filtering it * **Is this code covered by automated tests?**: No * **Has the fix been verified in Nightly?**: No * **Needs manual test from QE?**: Yes * **If yes, steps to reproduce**: See comment #0 * **List of other uplifts needed**: n/a * **Risk to taking this patch**: Low * **Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky)**: The patch in itself is very straightforward (-2/+1 lines of JS), any risk is coming from the fact that we're out of beta runway, and the lack of automated testing here (there are tests, but they're clearly not exercising this code...) * **String changes made/needed**: None
Bug 1533389 Comment 9 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
### Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request * **Feature/Bug causing the regression**: Bug 1516442 * **User impact if declined**: a duplicate/mismatching item appears at the top of the application/handler list in the preferences when sorting or filtering it * **Is this code covered by automated tests?**: No * **Has the fix been verified in Nightly?**: No * **Needs manual test from QE?**: Yes * **If yes, steps to reproduce**: See comment #0 * **List of other uplifts needed**: n/a * **Risk to taking this patch**: Low * **Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky)**: The patch in itself is very straightforward (-2/+1 lines of JS), any risk is coming from the fact that we're out of beta runway, and the lack of automated testing here (there are tests, but they're clearly not exercising this code to the point where they noticed the issue...) * **String changes made/needed**: None