Bug 1542146 Comment 7 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Yes it's the same thing that we have with clang-tidy based analysis, we don't have a setup that detects that the artifact is newer than what we have locally in order to begin the update process. 
This was one of the reasons why we've added ```clang-tidy``` package to ```bootstrap```, but this is sub-optimal so I've opened 1542694 for this.
Yes it's the same thing that we have with clang-tidy based analysis, we don't have a setup that detects that the artifact is newer than what we have locally in order to begin the update process. 
This was one of the reasons why we've added ```clang-tidy``` package to ```bootstrap```, but this is sub-optimal so I've opened bug 1542694 for this.

Back to Bug 1542146 Comment 7