Bug 1553396 Comment 5 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

(In reply to Paul [:pmac] McLanahan from comment #3)
> I do consider this a product details bug. If the latest release of Nightly is 68 then [product-details](https://product-details.mozilla.org/1.0/mobile_versions.json) shouldn't say 69. I've added a NI for :rail.

We're in a tricky situation. Nightly Desktop is 69, but Fennec Nightly remains on 68. 

(In reply to Paul [:pmac] McLanahan from comment #4)
> Though I will say it would be nice if we didn't have to rely on product-details for this and could instead have a bouncer link like release channel fennec[0]. The product could be `fennec-nightly-latest` since we already have `fennec-latest` and `fennec-beta-latest`.
> 
> [0] https://download.mozilla.org/?product=fennec-latest&os=android&lang=multi

That looks like a perfect plan to me 👍 I'm creating the products on bouncer.
(In reply to Paul [:pmac] McLanahan from comment #3)
> I do consider this a product details bug. If the latest release of Nightly is 68 then [product-details](https://product-details.mozilla.org/1.0/mobile_versions.json) shouldn't say 69. I've added a NI for :rail.

We're in a tricky situation. Nightly Desktop is 69, but Fennec Nightly remains on 68. 

(In reply to Paul [:pmac] McLanahan from comment #4)
> Though I will say it would be nice if we didn't have to rely on product-details for this and could instead have a bouncer link like release channel fennec[0]. The product could be `fennec-nightly-latest` since we already have `fennec-latest` and `fennec-beta-latest`.

That looks like a perfect plan to me 👍 I'm creating the products on bouncer.

Back to Bug 1553396 Comment 5