(In reply to Matt Howell (he/him) [:mhowell] from comment #12) > (In reply to Robert Strong (Robert they/them) [:rstrong] (use needinfo to contact me) from comment #11) > > I'm not suggesting renaming shortcuts. I am suggesting that on install not overwriting existing shortcuts and create some type of naming so the client has at least a clue that they have more than one install along with a more descriptive name for the shortcut if possible. > > Sorry, misinterpreted there. I'm still not certain what we could put in the shortcut name that would be helpful. Open to suggestions. I'm thinking that this comes up enough that not letting perfect be the enemy of good or more likely better than the current state so naming it just about anything would be better than the current state of things. Also, the clients that only have one installation which should be the majority won't have additional shortcuts. With the recent changes to how profiles are handled along with this bug I think even just appending a number would be better that where we are now.
Bug 1557117 Comment 13 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Matt Howell (he/him) [:mhowell] from comment #12) > (In reply to Robert Strong (Robert they/them) [:rstrong] (use needinfo to contact me) from comment #11) > > I'm not suggesting renaming shortcuts. I am suggesting that on install not overwriting existing shortcuts and create some type of naming so the client has at least a clue that they have more than one install along with a more descriptive name for the shortcut if possible. > > Sorry, misinterpreted there. I'm still not certain what we could put in the shortcut name that would be helpful. Open to suggestions. I'm thinking that this comes up enough that not letting perfect be the enemy of good or more likely better than the current state so naming it just about anything would be better than where we are now. Also, the clients that only have one installation which should be the majority won't have additional shortcuts. With the recent changes to how profiles are handled along with this bug I think even just appending a number would be better that where we are now.
(In reply to Matt Howell (he/him) [:mhowell] from comment #12) > (In reply to Robert Strong (Robert they/them) [:rstrong] (use needinfo to contact me) from comment #11) > > I'm not suggesting renaming shortcuts. I am suggesting that on install not overwriting existing shortcuts and create some type of naming so the client has at least a clue that they have more than one install along with a more descriptive name for the shortcut if possible. > > Sorry, misinterpreted there. I'm still not certain what we could put in the shortcut name that would be helpful. Open to suggestions. I'm thinking that this comes up enough that not letting perfect be the enemy of good or more likely better than the current state so naming it just about anything would be better than where we are now. Also, the clients that only have one installation which should be the majority won't have additional shortcuts. With the recent changes to how profiles are handled along with this bug I think even just appending a number would be better than where we are now.