Bug 1559356 Comment 13 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

(In reply to sam from comment #12)
> They should be parsed as http(s) URLs. There is an optional non-standard version parameter (see https://github.com/pfrazee/parse-dat-url), however to avoid over-complication at this point I think this can be omitted for the time-being.
> 
> Examples:
> `dat://example.com/test`
> `dat://41f8a987cfeba80a037e51cc8357d513b62514de36f2f9b3d3eeec7a8fb3b5a5/`

Thanks for the info. Yes, this makes it a candidate to lump together with dweb, but I assume dat didn't have a host before bug 1536744 either, right? Or is this the fix for https://github.com/sammacbeth/dat-fox/issues/18 ?
(In reply to sam from comment #12)
> They should be parsed as http(s) URLs. There is an optional non-standard version parameter (see https://github.com/pfrazee/parse-dat-url), however to avoid over-complication at this point I think this can be omitted for the time-being.
> 
> Examples:
> `dat://example.com/test`
> `dat://41f8a987cfeba80a037e51cc8357d513b62514de36f2f9b3d3eeec7a8fb3b5a5/`

Thanks for the info. Yes, this makes it a candidate to lump together with dweb, but I assume `dat` didn't have a host before bug 1536744 either, right? Or is this the fix for https://github.com/sammacbeth/dat-fox/issues/18 ?

Back to Bug 1559356 Comment 13