(In reply to Andrea Marchesini [:baku] from comment #6) > * **How easily could an exploit be constructed based on the patch?**: UAF - no exploitable. That doesn't match the results in bug 1565526 comment 6. Is that one not a dupe then?
Bug 1567419 Comment 22 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Andrea Marchesini [:baku] from comment #6) > * **How easily could an exploit be constructed based on the patch?**: UAF - no exploitable. ~~That doesn't match the results in bug 1565526 comment 6. Is that one not a dupe then?~~ Never mind, it was explicitly confirmed in that bug.