> Have you got your bugs mixed up? Bug 1572467 is the one that belongs with bug 1571772. No, I really meant bug 1571772 and this bug 1572418 together. The relation is on the high level, not on the technical level. > I'd be inclined to to throw bug 1572418 (this one here) and bug 1571772 and bug 1572467 into the same lot and uplift all or none. Agreed. That's what I meant.
Bug 1572418 Comment 29 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
Neil wrote in comment 27: > Have you got your bugs mixed up? Bug 1572467 is the one that belongs with bug 1571772. No, I really meant bug 1571772 and this bug 1572418 together. The relation is on the high level, not on the technical level. Jörg wrote in comment 28: > I'd be inclined to to throw bug 1572418 (this one here) and bug 1571772 and bug 1572467 into the same lot and uplift all or none. Agreed. That's what I meant.