### Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request * **User impact if declined**: None to end-users. Geckoview developers will get Android signing jobs busted if they attempt to run try against beta. * **Is this code covered by automated tests?**: Yes * **Has the fix been verified in Nightly?**: Yes * **Needs manual test from QE?**: No * **If yes, steps to reproduce**: * **List of other uplifts needed**: None * **Risk to taking this patch**: Low * **Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky)**: The patch just impacts `try` on beta. Other branches aren't touched. * **String changes made/needed**: None
Bug 1573751 Comment 8 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
Good eye! I agree it's worth uplifting to beta. ### Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request * **User impact if declined**: None to end-users. Geckoview developers will get Android signing jobs busted if they attempt to run try against beta. * **Is this code covered by automated tests?**: Yes and no. This code impacts CI so it's exercised every time something/someone asks for a signed geckoview beta. Although, there is no automated tests for this kind of CI config. * **Has the fix been verified in Nightly?**: Yes * **Needs manual test from QE?**: No * **If yes, steps to reproduce**: * **List of other uplifts needed**: None * **Risk to taking this patch**: Low * **Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky)**: The patch just impacts `try` on beta. Other branches aren't touched. * **String changes made/needed**: None