Bug 1581529 Comment 21 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Original comment by
on 
(In reply to Bob Clary [:bc:] from comment #19)
> Going forward, we will be more careful about making certain that the intended image is being used and validating that new images do not introduce regressions. As for supporting the condprofile work, aerickson is working on standing up an Ubuntu 18.04 image which natively supports newer python2 and python3 versions. We will test this extensively for memory use and regressions before switching over.

So should we consider this regression fixed and the caused 100% found?
Revision 1 by
on 
(In reply to Bob Clary [:bc:] from comment #19)
> Going forward, we will be more careful about making certain that the intended image is being used and validating that new images do not introduce regressions. As for supporting the condprofile work, aerickson is working on standing up an Ubuntu 18.04 image which natively supports newer python2 and python3 versions. We will test this extensively for memory use and regressions before switching over.

So should we consider this regression fixed and the caused 100% found? Could we wrap this up?

Back to Bug 1581529 Comment 21