Bug 1587867 Comment 28 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

This sounds like entering fuzzy testing matters; testing just this case would be trivial, but it wouldn't bring much benefit, we should rather fuzzy testing with random input. Unfortunately that is also a lot more complicate.  That said, if Drew wants to add a test it's fine, I didn't consider it critical, because this is one of those cases you're unlikely to hit again, while you may hit a thousands others that fuzzy testing may discover while this test would ignore.
This sounds like entering fuzzy testing matters; testing just this case would be trivial, but it wouldn't bring much benefit, we should rather fuzzy testing with random input. Unfortunately that is also a lot more complicate.  That said, if Drew wants to add a test it's fine. I didn't consider it critical, because this is one of those cases you're unlikely to hit again, while you may hit a thousands others that fuzzy testing may discover while this test would ignore.

Back to Bug 1587867 Comment 28