Bug 1589883 Comment 14 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

### Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
* **User impact if declined**: The certificate viewer was reporting a wrong OCSP
* **Is this code covered by automated tests?**: Yes
* **Has the fix been verified in Nightly?**: Yes
* **Needs manual test from QE?**: Yes
* **If yes, steps to reproduce**: 
* **List of other uplifts needed**: None
* **Risk to taking this patch**: Low
* **Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky)**: I think this patch is not risky since I changed an if statement
* **String changes made/needed**:
### Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
* **User impact if declined**: The certificate viewer was reporting a wrong OCSP
* **Is this code covered by automated tests?**: Yes
* **Has the fix been verified in Nightly?**: No
* **Needs manual test from QE?**: I don't know
* **If yes, steps to reproduce**: 
* **List of other uplifts needed**: None
* **Risk to taking this patch**: Low
* **Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky)**: I think this patch is not risky since I changed an if statement
* **String changes made/needed**:
### Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
* **User impact if declined**: The certificate viewer was reporting a wrong OCSP
* **Is this code covered by automated tests?**: Yes
* **Has the fix been verified in Nightly?**: I don't know
* **Needs manual test from QE?**: I don't know
* **If yes, steps to reproduce**: 
* **List of other uplifts needed**: None
* **Risk to taking this patch**: Low
* **Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky)**: I think this patch is not risky since I changed an if statement
* **String changes made/needed**:
### Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
* **User impact if declined**: The certificate viewer was reporting a wrong OCSP
* **Is this code covered by automated tests?**: Yes
* **Has the fix been verified in Nightly?**: I don't know
* **Needs manual test from QE?**: I don't know
* **If yes, steps to reproduce**: 
* **List of other uplifts needed**: None
* **Risk to taking this patch**: Low
* **Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky)**: I think this patch is not risky since I changed an if statement
* **String changes made/needed**: The OCSP section was showing the result of "Critical" as "Required", which is wrong; now, it only renders the section when `cert.ext.ocspStaple.required` is true
### Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
* **User impact if declined**: The certificate viewer was reporting a wrong OCSP
* **Is this code covered by automated tests?**: Yes
* **Has the fix been verified in Nightly?**: No
* **Needs manual test from QE?**: No
* **If yes, steps to reproduce**:
* **List of other uplifts needed**: None
* **Risk to taking this patch**: Low
* **Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky)**: I think this patch is not risky since I changed an if statement
* **String changes made/needed**: None.

Back to Bug 1589883 Comment 14