Bug 1600668 Comment 3 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

Yes, that's true. I was aware of this issue for some time, but didn't raise it, unfortunately.
Dave, we should consider moving the performance schema validation at `mozilla-central` level, for whatever jobs that submits perf data.
Not sure, but I believe only Talos & Raptor are fair players and perform this validation. Other perf data producers don't do it.
We need to put this validation mechanism at a higher level than that of individual perf data producer.
Yes, that's true. I was aware of this issue for some time, but didn't raise it, unfortunately.

Dave, we should consider moving the performance schema validation at `mozilla-central` level, for whatever jobs that submits perf data.
Not sure, but I believe only Talos & Raptor are fair players and perform this validation. Other perf data producers don't do it.
We need to put this validation mechanism at a higher level than that of individual perf data producer.
Yes, that's true. I was aware of this issue for some time, but didn't raise it, unfortunately.

Dave, we should consider putting this validation mechanism at a higher level than that of individual perf data producer.
Not sure, but I believe only Talos & Raptor *(plus another producer which hasn't been officially registered)* are the only fair players which perform this validation. Other perf data producers don't do it.
We need to .
Yes, that's true. I was aware of this issue for some time, but didn't raise it, unfortunately.

Dave, we should consider putting this validation mechanism at a higher level than that of individual perf data producer.
Not sure, but I believe only Talos & Raptor *(plus another producer which hasn't been officially registered)* are the only fair players which perform this validation. Other perf data producers don't do it.

Back to Bug 1600668 Comment 3