(In reply to Magnus Melin [:mkmelin] from comment #34) > (In reply to Thomas D. from comment #33) > > I think you accidentally used a very old version of this patch (patch file name hasn't changed since): the last and only patch here with "Thomas > > Nope, it's something with the current one too. I don't know what. Current patch is attachment 9122757 [details] [diff] [review]. I downloaded that from here again and double-checked the Encoding with Notepad++: UTF-8 mit Unix-LFs. Your error says: `UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xfc in position 36` If that's position 36 of the entire patch, there's "u" (without umlauts), and Notepad++ isn't showing any other extraneous or mischievous character at that position.
Bug 1602431 Comment 35 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Magnus Melin [:mkmelin] from comment #34) > (In reply to Thomas D. from comment #33) > > I think you accidentally used a very old version of this patch (patch file name hasn't changed since): the last and only patch here with "Thomas > > Nope, it's something with the current one too. I don't know what. Current patch is attachment 9122757 [details] [diff] [review]. I downloaded that from here again and double-checked the Encoding with Notepad++: UTF-8 with Unix-LFs. Your error says: `UnicodeDecodeError: 'utf8' codec can't decode byte 0xfc in position 36` If that's position 36 of the entire patch, there's "u" (without umlauts), and Notepad++ isn't showing any other extraneous or mischievous character at that position.