Bug 1605619 Comment 4 Edit History

Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.

(In reply to :Gijs (he/him) from comment #2)
> The regressing bug was uplifted to 72, but you marked that not affected - you're sure about that? If so, it must be some interaction between the regressing commit and some other commit... just not sure what that would be. :-(

Firefox 72 got the backout patch, while Firefox 73 had the HTML elements patch, which might explain this.
(In reply to :Gijs (he/him) from comment #2)
> The regressing bug was uplifted to 72, but you marked that not affected - you're sure about that? If so, it must be some interaction between the regressing commit and some other commit... just not sure what that would be. :-(

In bug 1599783, Firefox 72 got the backout patch, while Firefox 73 had the HTML elements patch, which might explain this.
(In reply to :Gijs (he/him) from comment #2)
> The regressing bug was uplifted to 72, but you marked that not affected - you're sure about that? If so, it must be some interaction between the regressing commit and some other commit... just not sure what that would be. :-(

In bug 1599783, Firefox 72 got the backout patch, while Firefox 73 received the HTML elements patch, which might explain this.

Back to Bug 1605619 Comment 4